Report on Performance
Overview of Ministry Goals and Linkage to
Government Strategic Goals
The ministry supports the Five Great Goals by creating a strong economy and balanced budgets; thereby, providing the means to develop excellence in education, promote healthy living, support people at risk, protect our environment and create jobs for British Columbians. The figure below illustrates how the ministry's goals and objectives are aligned with, and contribute to, the success of government's Five Great Goals.
Performance Plan Summary Table
Synopsis of Ministry Performance Measure Results
1 The Five Great Goals are: | |
1. | Make British Columbia the best educated, most literate jurisdiction on the continent. |
2. | Lead the way in North America in healthy living and physical fitness. |
3. | Build the best system of support in Canada for persons with disabilities, those with special needs, children at risk, and seniors. |
4. | Lead the world in sustainable environmental management, with the best air and water quality, and the best fisheries management, bar none. |
5. | Create more jobs per capita than anywhere else in Canada. |
Goals, Objectives, Strategies and Performance Measures
Ministry Goal 1
Maintain a balanced budget annually.
The Balanced Budget and Ministerial Accountability Act requires that all provincial budgets must be balanced (i.e., either a positive surplus or zero balance; budget deficits are prohibited). This requirement supports sound fiscal management and is a cornerstone in maintaining confidence in British Columbia's economy as well as providing a stable foundation on which to sustain and enhance the delivery of public services. It supports a strong and vibrant economy and provides the means to develop excellence in education, promote healthy living, support people at risk, protect our environment, and create jobs for British Columbians. Fiscal responsibility today means that the cost of current public services will not be passed on to future generations.
Objective 1. Effective management of government's fiscal plan.
Core Business Area: Financial and Economic Performance.
Development and maintenance of a prudent and resilient fiscal plan is critical to government's ability to balance the provincial budget annually. The ministry plays a critical role in overseeing the fiscal plan and works closely with ministry and other public sector partners to ensure that government's annual and three-year revenue and expenditure targets are met.
Strategies
In 2005/06 the following key strategies were used to achieve the objective:
1. full integration of Crown corporations and the schools, universities, colleges and hospitals (SUCH) sector into the fiscal planning process:
a. the fiscal planning process in 2005/06 included the establishment of revenue and expenditure targets for Crown corporations and SUCH sector agencies.
2. continual update of government's three-year fiscal plan including monitoring and corrective action as required:
a. the ministry prepared a three-year fiscal plan, which government tabled in the Legislature on February 21, 2006. This plan included projected surpluses of $600 million in 2006/07, $400 million in 2007/08 and $150 million in 2008/09.
Performance Measures
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual | 2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Achieve annual targets for provincial budget. | $2.6 billion deficit | $1.2 billion deficit | $2.7 billion surplus | The balanced budget target in the September Budget Update was a $1.3 billion surplus1 | $3.1 billion surplus | $1.8 billion | Target exceeded |
Selection Rationale 1. The "balanced budget" performance target is defined as the amount in the September Budget Update, a $1.3 billion surplus. Government's ability to balance the budget and adhere to its fiscal plan is measured by a comparison of actual expenses and revenues (as detailed in the Public Accounts) with budgeted spending and revenue targets (as detailed in the Estimates) at both the ministry and overall government levels. If the actual surplus meets or exceeds budgeted surplus for year, then the performance measure has been achieved. The achievement of annual and three-year targets outlined by ministries in their Service Plans provide a meaningful status report on the government's commitment to maintain a balanced provincial budget. Treasury Board Staff will work with the respective ministries, Crown corporations, agencies, school districts, universities, colleges and institutes and health care organizations (the SUCH Sector) to monitor progress in meeting the approved spending and revenue targets. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation The target was exceeded, mainly due to stronger than expected taxation revenues supported by improvements in natural resource revenues, lower interest costs and other expenditure savings. |
|||||||
Data Sources Budget and Three-Year Fiscal Plan Ministry and Crown corporation and agency Service Plans and SUCH sector forecast — overall spending targets Estimates — detailed spending information for the year ahead Quarterly reports — forecast prepared by Ministries, Crown corporations and agencies and the SUCH sector Public Accounts — annual summary of actual government spending and revenues The Office of the Auditor General will audit the year-end financial statements for government and thus validate the results reported in the Public Accounts. |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure The baseline figures have been changed to reflect changes in accounting policy. |
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Taxpayer Supported Debt to GDP Ratio. | 21.3% | 20.6% | 18.2% | Annually reduce the taxpayer supported debt to GDP ratio | 16.2% | 2.0% | Target achieved |
Selection Rationale Maintaining a relatively low taxpayer-supported debt to GDP ratio signifies a healthy balance sheet and effectively means affordable debt levels. Rating agencies rely on this balance-sheet measure as a key credit rating consideration. Success in meeting the target is determined by comparing British Columbia's taxpayer supported debt to GDP performance from the current year to the previous year as calculated in the Public Accounts. The target is achieved if the current year's Taxpayer Supported Debt to GDP ratio is lower than the previous year's ratio. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation This target was exceeded due to lower debt levels and higher economic performance than in the previous year. |
|||||||
Data Sources The Public Accounts |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure The measure has been renamed to "Taxpayer Supported Debt to GDP Ratio" from "Debt to GDP Ratio" to more accurately describe the measure. |
Note: See provincial comparison of taxpayer supported debt as a percentage of GDP in Appendix 5.
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Provincial credit rating (Moody's). | Aa2 | Aa2 | Aa1 | Aa1 | Aa1 | None | Target achieved |
Selection Rationale The interest rate paid by the Province when it borrows in the domestic and international capital markets will be lower the higher the credit ratings supplied by third party agencies. In determining a credit rating, agencies consider the borrower's ability to promptly pay the interest and principal due based upon the borrower's balance sheet and income statement. In the case of the Province, rating agencies evaluate debt as a percentage of GDP, and the significance of interest owing as a percentage of gross receipts. Moody's rates bonds in descending alphabetical order from A to C - highest to lowest. (Aaa, Aa, A, Baa, Ba, B, Caa, Ca, C) The Aa rating is provided to those public and private sector organizations that offer excellent financial security and are generally considered high investment-grade entities. The Aa rating is further subdivided into Aa1, Aa2 and Aa3, with Aa1 being a higher rating than Aa2, and Aa2 higher than Aa3. If the provincial credit rating is equal to or better than the target level for the Moody's rating, the performance measure has been achieved. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation No variance — target met. Note: Moody's confirmed the Province's Aa1 credit rating with a stable outlook in April 2006. Standard and Poor's increased the Province's credit rating from AA to AA+ in March 2006, in line with Moody's rating of the Province. |
|||||||
Data Sources Moody's Investors Service ratings |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure None |
Note: See table of comparative provincial credit ratings in Appendix 5.
Ministry Goal 2
A tax and regulatory climate that supports a strong and vibrant economy.
The Ministry of Finance plays an essential role in the creation and maintenance of a tax and regulatory climate that supports economic development and employment opportunities. The ministry continuously reviews provincial tax policies, including business tax policies, to ensure the province remains competitive. Since 2001, the ministry has delivered a series of tax reductions targeted to individuals and businesses. These initiatives include a 25 per cent reduction in personal income taxes ensuring individuals in the bottom two-tax brackets now have the lowest personal income tax rates in the country. The province has also introduced an 18 per cent reduction in the general corporate income tax rate, eliminated the capital tax for general corporations and provided an exemption from provincial sales tax for production machinery and equipment. Other more targeted initiatives include property tax relief for small hydroelectric projects and the province's major port operators, new incentives for digital animation and visual effects and an increase in the threshold for the small business tax rate. As a result of these steps, the province's businesses can now rely on a tax environment that allows them to compete and succeed on the international stage while creating jobs at home.
The ministry will continue to reduce unnecessary regulation and red tape in the province to improve the effectiveness of regulatory frameworks and strengthen consumer confidence. The ministry is undertaking a broad review of the Insurance Act, which sets out statutory requirements applying to contracts of life insurance and of property and casualty insurance (such as for fire and liability), other than automobile insurance. Other initiatives include an expansion of e-government that will improve service, expand accessibility and reduce cost.
Objective 1. A fair and competitive tax environment.
Core Business Area: Financial and Economic Performance.
The province's ability to develop a strong and vibrant economy is dependent upon having a tax environment that is competitive both nationally and internationally. Jurisdictions with competitive tax regimes and regulatory frameworks are successful in attracting and retaining personal and business investment. Taking advantage of these opportunities enhances economic development and increases the revenues available to support critical government services like health care and education. In addition, a tax system that is perceived to be fair increases the confidence of British Columbians in their government.
Strategies
In 2005/06 the following key strategies were used to achieve the objective:
1. ongoing review of the Province's tax system in comparison to other jurisdictions
a. Budget 2006 included a number of announcements / changes directed at maintaining and improving competitiveness:
i. Enhanced dividend tax credit;
ii. extension of B.C. Mining Flow-Through Share Tax Credit;
iii. extension of enhanced film tax credit rates to 2008;
iv. new provincial sales tax (PST) exemption for services to maintain or modify software;
v. expansion of PST exemption for production machinery and equipment;
vi. increase in motor vehicle surtax threshold to $55,000;
vii. expansion of eligible uses of lower-taxed coloured fuel;
viii. allocation of $90 million over three years for new training and skills development tax credits; and
ix. increase in budget for venture capital programs.
2. analysis of potential reforms to maintain and improve competitiveness
Performance Measures
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Provincial ranking of personal income tax rates for the bottom two tax brackets. | Lowest | Lowest | Lowest | Lowest | Lowest | None | Target achieved |
Selection Rationale This performance measure stems from the government's commitment to cut the base personal income tax rate for the bottom two tax brackets to the lowest rate of any province in Canada. Keeping these tax rates low is consistent with the objective of maintaining a competitive tax system that encourages investment and innovation. Comparison of British Columbia's bottom two bracket rates with those of the other 10 provinces. If British Columbia has the lowest personal income tax rate for the bottom two tax brackets the performance measure has been achieved. With annual indexing British Columbia's bottom two tax brackets have risen to $66,123 in 2005 from $60,009 in 2000. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation No variance — target met. |
|||||||
Data Sources Personal income tax legislation and budgets from all 10 provinces. |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure None |
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Provincial ranking of the top personal marginal tax rate. | In the Lowest 3 | In the Lowest 3 | 2nd Lowest | Remain in the Lowest 3 | 2nd Lowest | None | Target achieved |
Selection Rationale Comparison of provincial top marginal personal income tax rates is a key component in the decision making processes of investors, in choosing where to invest, and firms in choosing where to locate. Inter-provincial comparison of top marginal personal income tax rates. If the top personal marginal tax rate is equal to, or lower than the target, the performance measure has been achieved. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation No variance — target met. |
|||||||
Data Sources Personal income tax legislation from all 10 provinces. |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure This measure has been deleted in 2006/07 in order to focus on the most critical aspects of performance. The measure will continue to be tracked for internal management purposes. |
Objective 2. Efficient and effective financial and corporate regulatory frameworks and services that protect the public interest.
Core Business Area: Financial and Corporate Sector Services and Financial and Economic Performance and Analysis.
An efficient and effective regulatory and policy framework promotes investments and innovation in the Province. Unnecessary regulatory requirements increase the cost of doing business in the province resulting in wasted time and effort for both individuals and businesses. Conversely, streamlined legislative and policy frameworks supported by the electronic delivery of services can achieve the same outcomes while acting as a driver for further business development and investment and continuing to foster consumer confidence.
Strategies
In 2005/06 the following key strategies were used to achieve the objective:
1. updating and implementing new legislative frameworks for streamlined financial and corporate sector regulation
a. the ministry continued its work to complete the new legislative framework for auto insurance, including technical amendments to Bill 93, the Insurance (Motor Vehicle) Amendment Act, 2003 that were passed during Spring 2006 legislative session.
b. in 2005/06, a broad review of the Insurance Act was initiated to modernize legislation that has not been updated for many years. Other provinces have indicated that they will be monitoring our review so that they may consider adopting harmonized provisions. This will be a major contribution to the updating of business framework law in B.C. and Canada.
c. new legislation was passed in the Spring 2006 legislative session to provide limited liability, similar to that available to shareholders of corporations, for investors in publicly traded income trusts. This will bring B.C. into line with Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec, all of which have adopted this type of protection for investors in income trusts.
d. following the completion of a number of major policy reviews that were conducted from 2002 to 2004, the ministry also monitored the post-implementation phases of several new or substantially revised pieces of legislation, resulting in technical amendments to the Real Estate Services Act, Real Estate Development Act, Financial Institutions Act, Credit Union Incorporation Act and the Business Corporations Act.
e. legislation was also developed in consultation with other provinces for a uniform Securities Transfer Act based on the Uniform Law Commission's model statute, with consequential amendments to the Personal Property Security Act, Business Corporations Act and other statutes. This legislation, once enacted, will provide a sound legal foundation for the holding and transfer of security instruments, consistent with international recommendations and the legal rules currently in place in the United States.
f. ministry staff continues to monitor issues relating to private pension plans, and is developing strategies to address emerging policy issues.
g. ministry policy and Registries staff played a key role in negotiating terms under the newly ratified Alberta-British Columbia Trade, Investment, and Labour Mobility Agreement to streamline business registration and reporting requirements.
2. expansion of electronic service delivery initiatives
a. more than 98 per cent of estimated companies in British Columbia successfully filed a transition application by the March 28, 2006 deadline, as required under the Business Corporations Act.
b. the Corporate Online system was enhanced to allow for email notification of several filings to reduce the burden on businesses. First introduced in 2004, Corporate Online is nearing its 1,000,000 electronic filing transaction.
c. 96 per cent of partnership and proprietorship applications are now completed electronically through the OneStop Business Registry, up from 73 per cent in 2004. OneStop is now available to businesses and the public online, 24 hours a day and seven days a week, and surpassed the milestone of 100,000 electronic business transactions.
d. OneStop Business Registry added four new business number partners, four new municipal partners and five new service delivery partners.
e. OneStop Business Registry successfully launched the BizPal initiative in partnership with the City of Kamloops, Whitehorse, the Yukon Government, Ontario's Halton Region and the Government of Ontario. Also, OneStop successfully found a permanent business owner for BizPal in the Ministry of Small Business and Revenue and began transition of this program.
Performance Measures
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of regulatory requirements. | 34,706 | 25,581 | 25,581 | 25,581 | 22,171 | 3,414 fewer regulations | Target exceeded |
Selection Rationale Regulatory burden is a key consideration for individuals and firms considering whether to invest in the Province. Reducing red tape by eliminating unnecessary regulations improves the competitiveness of British Columbia's business environment and contributes to its economic growth. An important indicator of the overall regulatory burden on business is the number of regulatory requirements. Total number of regulatory requirements maintained by the Ministry of Finance. If the Ministry's actual regulatory count is equal to or less than the target regulatory counts, the performance measure has been achieved. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation The Ministry of Finance's regulatory reduction rate reached 43 per cent with the implementation of the Real Estate Services Act and Real Estate Development Marketing Act on January 1, 2005. As of May 2006, the Ministry of Finance has realized a further 7.5 per cent regulatory reduction to 22,171 largely due to further changes to the Financial Institutions Act. |
|||||||
Data Sources Each division and agency within the ministry is responsible for reporting increases or decreases in regulatory requirements to the ministry Deregulation Contact who updates the government's Regulatory Requirement Database. |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure The June 2004, baseline figure has been changed from 25,423 to 25,581 to reflect errors and omissions in the original regulatory count as well as the reassignment of statutes to different ministries following the June 2005 ministry reorganization. This measure has been deleted in 2006/07 in order to focus on the most critical aspects of performance. The measure will continue to be tracked for internal management purposes. |
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage annual growth in new business registrations. |
12.6% (48,767) |
5.4% (51,401) |
4.4% (53,304) |
5% (55,969) |
10% (58,598) |
5% higher growth rate | Target exceeded |
Selection Rationale An increase in the number of businesses operating in the province is an indicator of the Government's success in creating a tax and regulatory climate that stimulates economic growth. If the number of new business registrations increases is equal to or greater than the target, then the performance measure has been achieved. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation Continued strong economic growth and ease of business registration facilitated by new web-based systems. |
|||||||
Data Sources Ministry of Finance, Corporate and Personal Property Registries systems. Limitations of the data: Registries' data on newly created partnerships and proprietorships is not complete because such entities do not always register unless required to do so by third parties. |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure This measure has been deleted in 2006/07 in order to focus on the most critical aspects of performance. The measure will continue to be tracked for internal management purposes. |
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage of company incorporations and registrations filed electronically. | 77% | 84.1% | 95% | 95% | 95% | None | Target achieved |
Selection Rationale The transfer of paper-based company incorporations and registrations to electronic self-service over the Internet improves customer service at reduced costs. Registering parties are able to complete their transactions when they require it, pay for the service and obtain confirmation all online. Among the services offered electronically is the registration of business entities, encumbrances (liens) on personal property and ownership and location of manufactured homes in the province. If the percentage of company incorporations and registrations filed electronically is equal to, or greater than, the target levels the performance measure has been achieved. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation No variance — target met. |
|||||||
Data Sources Ministry of Finance Corporate and Personal Property Registries' monthly management reports. |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure This measure has been deleted in 2006/07 in order to focus on the most critical aspects of performance. The measure will continue to be tracked for internal management purposes. |
Ministry Goal 3
Effective financial and resource management and reporting.
The Ministry of Finance is responsible for government's overall financial and risk management framework. This involves the establishment of appropriate legislation, policies and procedures and reporting at a corporate level to ensure the Province's resources and obligations are appropriately managed in support of effective service delivery. This framework reinforces individual and corporate accountabilities for outcomes, maintains standards for stewardship of resources, management of liabilities and risk, and the collection and disbursement of public funds. Key activities include financial, procurement and accounting policy development, internal audit and advisory services, risk management, compliance monitoring and financial and economic reporting.
Objective 1. Effective risk-based cash and debt management.
Core Business Area: Treasury.
In 2005/06, government managed cash flows of approximately $100 billion. During the same year, debt service cost for the taxpayer supported debt portfolio was $1.5 billion. Ongoing improvement in the management of these cash and debt activities offers significant opportunities to reduce costs and redirect government resources to priority services.
Strategies
In 2005/06 the following key strategies were used to achieve the objective:
1. development of models and systems to maximize investment returns on surplus cash to minimize borrowing costs and requirements:
a. all three performance measures for cash management services were met. The opportunity cost of holding non-zero cash balances at each major financial institution was $256,249 (target is less than $300,000 annually); accuracy in forecasting consolidated cash position at each major financial institution was 76 per cent (benchmark is minimum 70 per cent accuracy); and, performance of the Province's money market fund as compared to Scotia Capital 30 day-T-Bill Index was matched at 2.6 per cent (target is to meet or outperform the Index).
b. converted to a new business banking platform for cash management and wire payment services (June 2005). The benefits realized include enhanced reporting and online access/viewing capabilities, and flexible payment setup and release options.
2. comprehensive support for credit rating analysis and investor relations activities:
conducted a Fall 2005 investor tour to Toronto and a spring 2006 investor tour to New York, Montreal and Toronto. Following the September Budget Update, the Second Quarterly Update released in November 2005, and the February 2006 Budget, an investor conference call was convened to brief investors on the fiscal and economic status of the Province. Following the February 21, 2006 Budget, day-long meetings were held with each of the three credit rating agencies: Moody's Investors Service, Standard and Poor's and Dominion Bond Rating Service. In March 2006, Standard and Poor's upgraded the Province's credit rating to AA+ from AA.
3. negotiation of banking services for government as a whole:
a. the ministry achieved competitive rates by leveraging economies of scale for banking services. In comparing banking fees charged to the Province against an industry survey (Stewart Associates), the ministry achieved 74 per cent of the industry average rate for general banking fees – 26 per cent lower than market.
b. the ministry migrated to a new debit and credit card processor (TD Merchant Services) and lowered fees payable during a period of increasing average credit card transaction size.
4. use of technological advancements (e.g., e-banking services) to create financial and administrative efficiencies and savings within ministries:
a. implemented nine e-payment services with client ministries in 2005/06, and launched a new refund enhancement for Internet payments, thus ensuring a secure and reliable refund process for credit card transactions.
b. implemented a new state-of-the-art straight-through-processing debt management system, replacing a number of legacy systems and spreadsheets. The new system significantly enhances the ability to manage the portfolio. It also significantly reduces the risk of errors, as data is entered once only, and is stored in a single database.
Performance Measures
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Debt service costs (Provincial ranking). | 2nd Lowest | 2nd Lowest | 2nd Lowest | 2nd Lowest | 2nd Lowest | None | Target achieved |
Selection Rationale A relatively low ratio of taxpayer-supported debt service cost to taxpayer-supported revenues or "interest bite" demonstrates fiscal prudence and an affordable debt burden. Rating agencies will rely on this measure as one among a number of important credit rating considerations. For every dollar of revenue that the government collects, Moody's estimated in May 2006 that as of March 31, 2006 approximately 5.3 cents goes towards debt servicing costs. If Moody's Investors Service's ranking of British Columbia's debt service costs relative to the other provinces is equal to or lower than the target level, the performance measure has been achieved. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation No variance — target met. |
|||||||
Data Sources Moody's Investors Service. The final report is available by July/August of each year. |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure None |
Note: See provincial comparison of the ratio of taxpayer supported debt service costs to taxpayer-supported revenue in Appendix 5.
Objective 2. Enhance risk-based management of government's resources.
Core Business Area: Financial Governance, Accounting and Reporting and Risk Management.
Creation of risk-based frameworks that reinforce individual and corporate accountabilities provides opportunities to reduce unnecessary constraints, realize efficiencies and improve outcomes. Risk-based practices are adopted only if they can demonstrate consistency with government priorities and add value using an optimal mix of resources and funding.
Strategies
In 2005/06 the following key strategies were used to achieve the objective:
1. expansion of government's self-insurance program to the broader public sector:
a. transitioned assets of the former British Columbia Buildings Corporation into a self-insured program.
2. assistance with implementation of Enterprise-wide Risk Management (ERM) practices:
a. completed a risk culture survey across government.
b. piloted and implemented an ERM implementation workshop for ministries.
3. risk-based audit planning:
a. a risk-based approach is used in developing all ministry and cross-government corporate audit plans. The Deputy Ministers' Committee on Internal Audit ensures audit resources are focused in the value added areas.
4. oversight of a comprehensive post-payment review system targeting high-risk transactions:
a. a new statistical sampling methodology was implemented in April 2005. The Office of the Comptroller General conducts quarterly reviews of payments to employees and reimbursement of travel expenses. There are also monthly reviews of payments to vendors and, more recently, compliance with procurement policy. Work is underway to develop a system of computer-based, continuous on-going monitoring of controls.
Performance Measures
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Annual savings from self insurance (five year rolling average). | $30.1 million | $43.1 million | $47.5 million | $43.2 million | $60.5 million | $17.3 million | Target exceeded |
Selection Rationale The Ministry of Finance's coordination of public sector self-insurance programs allows the provincial government to cost-effectively retain selected risks rather than transfer them at a premium to third parties. Self-insurance involves government assuming the role of a traditional insurer by investigating, defending and paying claims. Since 1986 self-insurance programs have saved the Province more than $650 million. These cost savings allow participating ministries, hospitals, health care agencies, school boards and social service agencies to direct their resources instead to the delivery of core services. If the annual savings from self-insurance is greater than, or equal to the target, the performance measure has been achieved. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation Private insurance costs increased significantly during the past five years, reflecting the cyclical nature of the insurance industry and lower returns on investments. The self-insurance program has not experienced the same cyclical downturn and as a result has generated savings in excess of the target. Further claims experience, in 2005/06, as represented by incurred values, was lower than expected. |
|||||||
Data Sources Ministry of Finance Risk Management Branch. Limitations of the data: N/A. |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure None |
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Potential average annual benefits realized from utilizing a risk based approach for post-payment monitoring and Internal Audit and Advisory Services recommendations. | $5.7 million | $13.8 million | $24 million | $5.7 million | $14.4 million | $8.7 million | Target exceeded |
Selection Rationale The ministry's delivery of cross-government risk-based financial transaction review through the Payment Review Office and independent management audit services, through Internal Audit and Advisory Services, provide a basis for evaluating government's adoption of best practices. Savings are achieved through management implementation of audit recommendations and more cost effective payment review procedures. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation Additional savings were identified by using a new model to evaluate the benefits of post-payment review and calculating savings attributable to Activity Based Management |
|||||||
Data Sources Post-payment sampling results and audit recommendations. |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure This measure has been changed to "Potential average annual benefits realized from utilizing a risk-based approach for post-payment monitoring and Internal Audit and Advisory Services and Activity Based Management recommendations" to more accurately describe the measure. |
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ministry implementation of Enterprise-wide Risk Management (Risk Management Maturity Model Rating - 5 point scale). | N/A | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | None | Target achieved |
The Risk Management Maturity Model has been selected by Risk Management Branch as the standard cross government tool for evaluating the implementation of Enterprise-wide Risk Management within an organization. The instrument uses a five-point scale (1 lowest and 5 highest) to explore aspects of:
|
|||||||
Variance Explanation No variance — target met. |
|||||||
Data Sources Risk Management Maturity Model. Limitations of the data: The Risk Maturity Model uses outcome descriptions to differentiate levels of organizational maturity. As such, some areas may not interpret the tool consistently due to the qualitative nature of the tool. |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure This measure has been deleted in 2006/07 in order to focus on the most critical aspects of performance. The measure will continue to be tracked for internal management purposes. |
Objective 3. Transparent and accountable financial and procurement policies and practices.
Core Business Area: Financial Governance, Accounting and Reporting.
Government is undergoing transition to a model that provides program managers with enhanced financial and procurement decision-making abilities within a defined accountability framework. This shift provides managers with additional tools and accountabilities to succeed, and is supported by an updated public sector management frameworks. The ministry plays an important role in the development of these governance frameworks and works closely with other ministries to ensure appropriate clarification of roles, responsibilities and accountabilities.
Strategies
In 2005/06 the following key strategies were used to achieve the objective:
1. review of financial and procurement legislation:
a. work is underway to review and streamline financial management legislation including the Financial Administration Act, Budget Transparency and Accountability Act, Financial Information Act and the Balanced Budget and Ministerial Accountability Act(BBMAA). Amendments to the BBMAA were passed in the Legislature in May 2006.
2. maintenance of a principles-based policy framework:
3. input into the development of training resources:
a. work continues to develop the award-winning Procurement and Contract Management Training program. Thirteen courses of a total syllabus of 20 courses have now been developed and work continues on the balance.
4. training development and delivery were also undertaken for Executive Financial Officers. Work will continue to build training, based on recently updated financial management competencies, for the government financial community ongoing monitoring and reporting on ministries' compliance with the accountability frameworks:
a. the review work conducted by the Payment Review Office (PRO) and Internal Audit provides good measures of compliance. PRO conducts monthly reviews on some types of payments made by government and quarterly reviews on other types.
b. both PRO and Internal Audit conduct reviews on compliance with the procurement policy framework in conjunction with the Procurement Governance Office.
Performance Measures
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stakeholders' satisfaction with the policy framework for financial and procurement management. | N/A | Determined Baseline at 44% | 60% | 65% | 57.5% | 7.5% lower satisfaction rate | Target mostly achieved |
Selection Rationale Government is transitioning from a control framework based on "command and control" to one based on performance measurement and personal accountability for results. This has resulted in a significant reduction (70 per cent) in the volume of core policy related to financial and procurement management. Ensuring that the policy framework provides sufficient guidance to managers while avoiding an overly prescriptive approach is essential. Accordingly, survey results from managers and other stakeholders provides information for improving the framework and its implementation. BC Stats calculates the percentage of response and satisfaction as part of their overall assessment of the survey. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation As government transitions from a control based framework to one based on providing sufficient guidance to managers while avoiding being overly prescriptive, responsibility for financial and procurement management is shifting from the policy area to ministries. This shift requires both policy and ministry staff to adjust to new responsibilities. As a result, government is seeing some flux in the satisfaction rates as people adapt to their new roles. As the model matures results are expected to improve. |
|||||||
Data Sources and Issues Annual Client Survey of the Office of the Comptroller General conducted by BC Stats: Satisfaction survey of key stakeholders including financial and procurement managers and other users. Limitations of the data: The percentage of satisfaction of our clients is determined from the responses to the client survey. Depending upon the response rate to the survey, the actual satisfaction level may be different than that determined by BC Stats. A very low response rate can tend to distort the results. |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure This measure has been deleted in 2006/07 in order to focus on the most critical aspects of performance. The measure will continue to be tracked for internal management purposes. |
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage of responses to ministerial within two weeks. | 40% | 29% | 22% | 80% | 47.75% | 32.25% lower response rate | Target missed |
Selection Rationale Achieving the ministry standard of responding to minister's correspondence within a two-week period ensures correspondents receive timely and relevant information. The Deputy Minister's office is the lead in this initiative. A comparison of the total number of logs in CLIFF assigned to the ministry from the minister's office to the amount responded to within a two-week period. If the percentage of responses to ministerial correspondence that has received an interim reply or is completed within two weeks is equal to, or greater than, the target levels the performance measure has been achieved. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation The ministry process is being streamlined and monitored for improved results. |
|||||||
Data Sources Ministry of Finance CLIFF Tracking System. Limitations of the data: Data does not take into account any delay in the ministry receiving the incoming correspondence or backlogs that might occur in final sign off. |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure None |
Objective 4. Meet statutory reporting requirements and comply with GAAP in all material respects.
Core Business Area: Financial Governance, Accounting and Reporting and Financial and Economic Performance and Analysis.
The Budget Transparency and Accountability Act (BTAA) requires that all accounting policies and practices applicable to documents required to be made public under this act (e.g., Budget and Public Accounts), must comply with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Adherence to GAAP requires monitoring of evolving accounting standards, consistent financial practices across government and full transparency for the use of public funds. This transparency is critical for ensuring that British Columbians and the investment community obtain the information they need to make informed decisions and have confidence in government's finances.
Strategies
In 2005/06 the following key strategies were used to achieve the objective:
1. ongoing monitoring of, and adherence to, GAAP's evolving accounting standards:
a. the Office of the Comptroller General (OCG) consults with organizations that develop accounting standards for senior government and some of our staff volunteered to assist these organizations with their standard setting work. The Province also contributes to private sector GAAP where it could potentially impact government accounting. This fiscal year, OCG has provided comments to standard setting bodies on 10 exposure drafts pertaining to emerging policy.
b. Treasury Board Staff works with the Office of the Comptroller General to ensure Budgets and Quarterly Reports are GAAP-compliant.
2. adoption of technology to improve the reporting processes:
a. the Office of the Comptroller General has several years of experience in using Caseware for preparation of the Public Accounts. The Office of the Comptroller General continues to refine the use of this software, and build reporting templates to make it easier to accumulate data from B.C. government reporting entities and assemble the Public Accounts.
3. working with the Auditor General and the Accounting Policy Advisory Committee (APAC) on accounting and reporting issues:
a. the Office of the Comptroller General meets regularly throughout the year with Auditor General staff, and with increasing frequency as annual Public Accounts preparation gets underway. This is a useful process to better understand the position of each organization and avoid problem areas.
b. the APAC meets about four times annually or as required to discuss government accounting policy and GAAP issues. Their input provides government with an external non-binding view of issues.
4. greater fiscal planning integration with the SUCH sector:
a. the Office of the Comptroller General works closely with its SUCH Sector partners with respect to quarterly and annual financial reporting. Work continues on developing and improving reporting templates to help streamline preparation of the financial reports and statements.
Performance Measures
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Full implementation of GAAP. | Partial | Partial | Full | Full | Full | None | Target achieved |
Selection Rationale Full implementation of GAAP in the fiscal 2004/05 Financial Statements (Public Accounts) meets a legislated requirement in the Budget Transparency and Accountability Act and improves the accuracy, consistency and timeliness of the province's financial information. Incorporation of schools, colleges, universities and health regions into the government entity made British Columbia the first provincial jurisdiction in Canada to be compliant with the new principles established by the Public Sector Accounting Board. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation No variance — target met. |
|||||||
Data Sources Members of the Public Sector Accounting Board have established specific accounting standards with representation from the provinces, territories and the federal government. The objectives of the project will be compared with its achievements and financial reporting to ensure that GAAP is fully implemented. |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure In 2006/07 this measure has been incorporated into a new performance measure, "Release of public accounts by June 30 with an unqualified audit opinion from the Office of the Auditor General". |
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Delivery date for annual Public Accounts. | June 27, 2003 | June 29, 2004 | June 29, 2005 | June 29, 2006 | TBD | TBD | Target achieved |
Selection Rationale Timely release of financial reporting is critical for effective use of the information and helps instill public confidence in government's ability to manage its resources. The Budget Transparency and Accountability Act requires release of the Province's financial statements (Public Accounts) by August 31st, following each March 31st, fiscal year end. While the legislated date is August 31st, the anticipated release date is by June 30th. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation The work of the Office of the Comptroller General will be completed by June 29, 2006, but the Office of the Auditor General has indicated their audit will not be completed by then. The release date will be July 17. |
|||||||
Data Sources Release of the Public Accounts. |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure In 2006/07 this measure has been incorporated into a new performance measure, "Release of public accounts by June 30 with an unqualified audit opinion from the Office of the Auditor General". |
Objective 5. Crown corporations are publicly accountable to taxpayers both in the delivery of their programs and services and in fiscal management.
Core Business Area: Crown Agencies Secretariat
1. A Crown corporation is an organization that is established by the provincial government that is outside of a ministry. Crown corporations are accountable to the government through a Responsible Minister; and have assigned/delegated authority and responsibility from government, or otherwise have statutory authority and responsibility to perform specified functions or services. An effective governance system will aid both government and Crown corporations by ensuring Crown corporations focus on the activities necessary to fulfill their mandates while at the same time ensure they are being managed in the best interests of public stakeholders and government.
Strategies
In 2005/06 the following key strategies were used to achieve the objective:
1. ensuring an effective framework for government's management of its Crown corporations in British Columbia:
a. issued a summary of the Crown Agency Accountability System on CAS website.
2. clearly outlining government's expectations of Crown corporations through Shareholder's Letters of Expectations:
a. Developed an updated template for Shareholder's Letters of Expectation and coordinated development of new letters (see results below) and renewal of existing letters.
3. providing input on cross-Crown corporation policy issues:
a. Policy issues included responses to reports by the Auditor General and initiatives from the Public Sector Accounting Board on performance reporting.
4. hosting workshops for Crown corporation and ministry staff on governance and performance planning and reporting and hosting Chief Financial Officer forums for all Crown corporations to promote best practices:
a. Hosted senior officials from the New Zealand Crown Company Monitoring and Advisory Unit and the UK Shareholder Executive and arranged meetings with Crown Agency and government staff to disseminate best practices;
b. Hosted a joint Crown Agency-Government Forum to discuss governance, reporting and budget issues.
5. publishing on the government website Crown corporation Shareholder's Letters of Expectations, signed off by Ministers Responsible and the Board Chairs of Crown corporation:
a. Shareholder Letters for all but two Crown corporations and posted on the Crown Agencies Secretariat website.
Performance Measures
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shareholder's Letters of Expectations in place or proposed to Responsible Ministers and Chairs for all Crown corporations. | N/A | N/A | 80% | 100% | 93% | 7% letters in place | Target mostly achieved |
Selection Rationale The Shareholder's Letter of Expectations (SLE) is a key component of the Accountability Framework for Crown corporations and is designed to ensure a shared understanding between the shareholder and Crown corporation Boards of Directors on key governance issues, corporate mandate direction from government, core Crown corporation services, strategic priorities and performance expectations of government for the corporations. The Shareholder's Letter is signed by the Minster Responsible, as the representative of government, and the Chair of the Board of the Crown corporation, as the representative of the Crown corporation. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation Shareholder Letters were not prepared for two Crown corporations pending completion of mandate or structural reviews. Note that this measure has been amended for 2006/07 to "Shareholder's Letters of Expectations in place for all applicable Crown corporations" to recognize that some corporations are inactive or winding up, and will not require a Shareholder's Letter. The target remains at 100 per cent. |
|||||||
Data Sources All completed SLEs are signed by the Minister and Chair of Board of the Crown corporation and posted on the Crown Agencies Secretariat website. |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure This measure has been changed to "Shareholder's Letter of Expectations in place for all applicable Crown corporations" to more accurately describe the measure. |
Objective 6. Effective management of public sector labour relations and human resource strategy.
Core Business Area: Public Sector Employers' Council
1. Public sector labour costs comprise a significant portion of the provincial budget. Accordingly, effective management of the Province's fiscal plan requires the establishment of appropriate and sustainable compensation levels. Labour market analysis and frameworks are also critical for attracting and retaining highly skilled workers critical to the delivery of many public services.
Strategies
In 2005/06 the following key strategies were used to achieve the objective:
1. maintenance of a compensation and bargaining mandate framework that incorporates fiscal goals, policy, program decisions, and labour market considerations".
a. The ministry set out a $6 billion, multi-year negotiating framework to guide public sector labour agreements. As of March 31, 2006 negotiators reached 55 agreements covering 75 per cent of British Columbia's 308,000 public sector workers. All agreements extended four years or more in duration and the vast majority received ratification approvals in excess of 90 per cent. Major components include:
- $1 billion as an incentive to reach new agreements before the expiry of current agreements;
- $4.7 billion over four year (2006/07 – 2009/10) for annual compensation increases; and
- up to $300 million dividend in 2009/10 for agreements that extend to March 31, 2010 or later, subject to the surplus exceeding $150 million.
2. A long-term strategy for effective management of labour relations that addresses shortages of critical skilled occupations in the public sector is also underway.
Performance Measures
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Sector cost changes over 2002/03 compensation base ($17.4 billion). | $17.4 billion | $16.1 billion | $16.0 billion | $17.4 billion or less | $17.0 billion | $0.4 billion lower cost | Target exceeded |
Selection Rationale This measure captures the public sector compensation changes over the 2002/03 compensation base. With compensation related costs in the public sector consuming a substantial portion of the provincial budget, the effective management of compensation costs requires the measurement and tracking of changes in the compensation base. Comparison of year over year increases to compensation base as derived from analysis of costs resulting from changes to collective agreements, the relative size of workforce(s) as well as payroll information pertaining to excluded and executive employees. PSEC conducts a comprehensive total compensation cost survey of all public sector employers. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation While compensation costs decreased relative to the 2002/03 benchmark of $17.43 billion, there was a relative increase over 2004/05 primarily due to improved reporting arising from new SUCH sector reporting requirements. |
|||||||
Data Sources Public Sector Employers' Council Secretariat (PSEC). Limitations of the data: Any increase or decrease in the size of the public sector would impact the compensation base, but is beyond PSEC's capacity to control. In addition, the nature of collective bargaining is such that an expired agreement may or may not be renegotiated and costed within the fiscal year in which it expires. Compensation cost changes may vary without being reflected in PSEC data. |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure This measure has been changed to "Public sector cost changes over the 2005/06 compensation base" to more accurately describe the measure. |
Ministry Goal 4
A leader in innovative business and people practices.
The ministry recognizes its dependence upon the continued support and professionalism of our highly-skilled and knowledgeable workforce. Ultimately, it is our staff that drives the quality and value of the services we provide to our clients, stakeholders and the people of British Columbia. Over the coming years, the ministry will pursue additional opportunities to provide its employees with the support, recognition and opportunities required.
Core Business Area: All.
Objective 1. Performance Focused Workforce.
Core Business Area: All.
The ministry works closely with its staff throughout the year to provide them with information on strategic priorities and how their work contributes to the success of the organization overall. Staff have reaffirmed that this communication clarifies expected results, supports organizational improvement and provides greater job satisfaction.
Strategies
In 2005/06 the following key strategies were used to achieve the objective:
1. regularly scheduled Community Conversations involving all members of the ministry
a. a number of community conversations were held with ministry staff.
2. employee participation in ministry human resource planning initiatives
a. the Corporate Planning Secretariat developed the Ministry Human Resources Plan with employee input
3. integration of planning and reporting processes
a. the Corporate Planning Secretariat was convened in November 2005 and this group undertook all planning and reporting activities for the ministry. Activities have resulted in a more integrated Business Plan for 2006/07, as well as a more effective planning calendar.
b. the 2006/07 Human Resources plan was integrated into the ministry's overall Business Plan, and staff throughout the ministry were engaged in developing objectives, strategies and actions through Community Conversations and their Corporate Planning Secretariat representatives.
4. ongoing reviews of the linkages between the Service Plan and operational activities
5. the ministry is also working to develop personal Employee Performance and Development Plans (EPDP) tailored to the position and developmental interests of each employee
a. a tailored EPDP pilot was implemented in ministry, and will be considered for expanded implementation within the ministry.
Performance Measures
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage of staff with a formal Performance Review (e.g., EPDP) in the last year. | 23% | 67% of managers | 58% Completed 35% in progress | 100% | 51% | 49% | Target missed |
Selection Rationale Formal Performance Reviews including the development of Employee Performance Development Plans (EPDPs) provide an important linkage between the activities of individuals and the strategic direction of their business unit and the ministry as a whole. Identifying performance expectations within EPDPs also supports greater accountability and improves communication between staff and supervisors. Finally, the EPDP exercise also provides staff with an opportunity to explore their personal growth and development objectives. If the percentage of respondents who have a formal Performance Review in the last year is equal to or greater than the target, the performance measure has been achieved. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation 2004/05 results indicate that 58% of EPDPs were completed, with 35% in progress. The 2005/06 Employee survey only measured completion rates, not those in progress. While the ministry has encouraged use of EPDPs, uptake has been slower than expected. The ministry recently piloted a new EPDP initiative which streamlines the EPDP process. |
|||||||
Data Sources This measure is a core question in the Work Environment and Employee Engagement Survey distributed to staff. The survey is delivered electronically, analyzed and reported by BC Stats using E-Surveyor software. |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure This measure has been deleted in 2006/07 in order to focus on the most critical aspects of performance. The measure will continue to be tracked for internal management purposes. |
Objective 2. Learning and Innovative Organization.
Core Business Area: All.
Government's move to a model focused on flexibility, evidence-based risk taking, and accountability for results, requires the support of a knowledgeable and innovate workforce. Members of the ministry have embraced this shift and have fostered a culture characterized by performance and receptiveness to change. In order to build upon our past success, the ministry will actively encourage the development of new skills based on formal and non-traditional learning opportunities and mutual trust.
Strategies
In 2005/06 the following key strategies, with the noted results, were used to achieve the objective:
1. identification of critical competencies and targeted skill sets
a. a workforce planning exercise identified critical positions. This work will continue in 2006/07.
b. a skills development inventory, mentoring program and orientation program were rolled out.
2. improved communication of, and access to, developmental opportunities (internship programs, career pathing, mentoring, rewards and recognition programs, development opportunities and critical skills training)
a. the ministry supported staff in attending a variety of leadership development and training courses and programs. A ministry-specific leadership program is being considered for 2006/07.
b. ministry employees participated in a large number of Temporary Assignments, which promote cross-ministry learning and development.
c. informal learning and development opportunities, such as lunch and learns and cross-divisional sharing sessions, were offered.
d. the Graduate Development Program was established for Treasury Board Staff.
3. flexibility in accommodating interested staff.
Performance Measures
Performance Measure | 2002/03 Actual |
2003/04 Actual |
2004/05 Actual |
2005/06 Target |
2005/06 Actual |
Variance | Target Met? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage of staff who agree they have adequate opportunities to develop their skills. | 66% | 44% | 62% | 80% | 57% | 23% | Target missed |
Selection Rationale The ministry is undertaking a comprehensive staff attraction and retention initiative. This initiative will ensure that the ministry has the necessary skill sets to support its activities in an increasingly complex environment. Providing staff with additional learning and development opportunities will position the ministry as an important professional development opportunity, benefit our employees and enhance the quality of our services. If the percentage of respondents who agree is equal to, or greater than the target, the performance measure has been achieved. |
|||||||
Variance Explanation Access to corporately provided training and development opportunities continue to be limited due to work and budget pressures and the timing and availability of courses. The ministry is considering customizing a management and leadership program to meet specific ministry needs. The ministry strongly supports Temporary Assignments and other on-the-job development opportunities. While less than the target, the ministry is 11% higher than the government average on this measure. |
|||||||
Data Sources and Issues This measure is a core question in the Work Environment and Employee Engagement Survey distributed to staff. The survey is delivered electronically, analyzed and reported by BC Stats using E-Surveyor software. |
|||||||
Changes to the Measure This measure has been deleted in 2006/07 in order to focus on the most critical aspects of performance. The measure will continue to be tracked for internal management purposes. |
Deregulation
The Ministry of Finance's regulatory reduction rate reached 43 per cent with the implementation of the Real Estate Services Act and Real Estate Development Marketing Act on January 1, 2005.
The ministry's June 2004 baseline figure has been changed from 25,423 to 25,581 to reflect errors and omissions in the original regulatory count as well as the reassignment of statutes to different ministries following the May 2005 election. As of May 2006 the Ministry of Finance has realized a further 7.5 per cent regulatory reduction to 22,171 largely due to further changes to the Financial Institutions Act.
Over the next two years, all legislative initiatives will be monitored to ensure that the policies are effective and allow industry, the public, and government to operate in an improved environment of "smart regulation".