Goals, Objectives, Strategies and Results — Continued
Goal 1: Key transportation infrastructure is improved to
drive economic growth and trade.
- Core Business Area:
- Transportation Improvements.
- Objective 1:
- Regional and local input is used when setting transportation
priorities.
- Strategies:
- 1. Create an environment in which Regional Transportation
Advisory Committees (RTACs) provide the ministry with informed
and independent advice.
- 2. Incorporate RTAC advice to the Minister in ministry planning.
Performance Measure |
Baseline |
2004/05 Target |
2005/06 Target |
2006/07 Target |
Annual reports from RTACs. |
Solicit input; review and incorporate input into ministry
planning. |
Review and respond to priority recommendations. |
Solicit input, and review and respond to priority recommen-dations. |
Solicit input, and review and respond to priority recommen-dations. |
What is being measured: The RTACs will provide annual reports
to the minister documenting their activities and recommendations.
These reports will identify regional needs and transportation priorities.
The successful incorporation of RTAC input will fulfill the
overall government commitment to give regions a greater say in their
transportation needs and planning.
- Objective 2:
- Available provincial investment dollars are used as effectively
as possible.
- Strategies:
- 1. Develop public-private partnerships, in consultation with
Partnerships BC.
- 2. Capture value from surplus land to fund transportation
improvements.
Performance Measure |
Baseline |
2004/05 Target |
2005/06 Target |
2006/07 Target |
Partnerships investment leveraged:
Private investment capital leveraged through public-private
partnerships, plus defrayed or reduced costs from efficient
land use.
|
$20 M |
$20 M |
$90 M |
$240 M |
What is being measured: The measure for investments leveraged
equals funds contributed from non-provincial treasury sources at
the time of construction. These include contributions from municipalities,
Crown corporations, First Nations and the private sector, but exclude
contributions from the federal government, which are measured separately.
The contribution/recovery from partners and the land contribution
by the province are measured against the gross cost of the capital
project. The ministry's success will be measured by the amount of
non-provincial funding obtained.
Note: The targets shown above have been revised downward
from those indicated in the previous service plan as a result of
the provincial government's decision not to proceed with a proposal
to lease the Coquihalla Highway to a private partner.
- Strategies:
- 1. Participate in the federal border infrastructure fund
program to improve major trade corridors in the lower mainland
serving border crossings and national gateways.
- 2. Pursue delivery of the Fraser Gateway program through
a private sector partnership.
- 3. Focus cost-shared investment in areas of economic and
trade opportunity.
Performance Measure |
Baseline |
2004/05 Target |
2005/06 Target |
2006/07 Target |
Federal funding investment leveraged:
Capital investment from federal government programs.
|
$48 M |
$79 M |
$69 M |
$58 M |
What is being measured: The above figures refer to the amount
of federal funding secured through B.C./Canada contribution agreements.
The amount of funding from the federal government will assist in
B.C.'s ability to achieve longer term sustainable financing for
transportation improvements. The ministry's ability to leverage
federal funding is dependent on B.C. government decisions with respect
to the availability of matching provincial funding, and federal
funding allocation and prioritization practices.
- Strategy:
- 1. Complete projects on budget and on time, using the best
project management practices.
Performance Measure |
Baseline |
2004/05 Target |
2005/06 Target |
2006/07 Target |
Capital Project Performance:
• Percentage of work completed on budget.
• Percentage of work completed on schedule.
|
100%
100%
|
100%
100%
|
100%
100%
|
100%
100%
|
What is being measured: All projects encompassed under the
capital program will be aggregated each fiscal year to compare 1)
the planned to actual cost of the projects, and 2) the scheduled
to actual progress of the projects.
- Objective 3:
- The worsening congestion trend in urban areas is mitigated.
- Strategies:
- 1. Implement cost effective highway upgrades that improve
traffic flow, reduce delay-causing crashes and add new capacity,
using partnership cost-sharing where feasible.
- 2. Make better use of existing capacity through intelligent
transportation systems initiatives and promoting travel demand
management initiatives.
- 3. Balance landowner access to main highways with the mobility
needs of long-distance users.
Performance Measure |
Baseline |
2004/05 Target |
2005/06 Target |
2006/07 Target |
Level of traffic congestion:
Percentage of urban vehicle kilometres travelled
in congested conditions.
|
13.6% |
14.3% |
14.6% |
15.0% |
What is being measured: Segments of the highway system are
categorized as urban or rural. Previous calculations for the rural
congestion rate resulted in very low rates of congestion, so the
reporting emphasis is now on urban areas where congestion is a growing
problem. A congested condition occurs when the measured hourly traffic
volume exceeds 80 per cent of the highway's capacity. Future targets
show congestion worsening over time due to increasing population
and travel demand. The cost of providing additional highway capacity
and the associated social and environmental impacts of doing same
limit the ministry's ability to reverse the congestion trend; however,
the ministry will continue to implement strategies to mitigate this
problem.
Note: 2003 data will not be available until April 2004,
therefore the baseline measure for traffic congestion is from 2002
data. Targets for this measure refer to the calendar and not fiscal
year (i.e. the 2004/05 target encompasses the period from January
to December 2004).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08341/08341b2b18606ad86e057bd4cabb808d021ed656" alt="Chart -- % of Urban Vehicle-Kilometres Travelled in Congestion by Year."
This chart is provided for general information and reference. The
top line is an estimate of the projected deterioration of performance,
due to increasing demand, if the ministry does nothing to improve
urban congestion. The bottom line illustrates that, although urban
congestion is expected to worsen in future years, the ministry's
strategies for dealing with congestion will be effective at reducing
the rate of deterioration.
- Objective 4:
- Improved mobility for highways servicing major economic
gateways.
- Strategies:
- 1. Improve mobility and reliability and reduce bottlenecks
on major urban and rural trade corridors using partnership cost-sharing
where feasible.
- 2. Reduce congestion at weigh scales by relocating them,
redesigning them, and/or using new technologies with intelligent
transportation systems to process truck traffic more efficiently.
Performance Measure |
Baseline |
2004/05 Target |
2005/06 Target |
2006/07 Target |
Commercial trucking travel time between economic gateways. |
Under development |
Under development |
Under development |
Under development |
What is being measured: The ministry will measure truck
travel time on specific highway segments which serve major economic
gateways using data obtained through existing satellite tracking
technology. Data capture is anticipated to commence in early 2004.
Note: The previous service plan included this objective:
"A practical long-term framework for an integrated, multi-modal
transportation system in B.C." This objective will be achieved once
the strategic framework document is in place by March 31, 2004.
The published document will remain a priority to the ministry and
will provide a framework for ongoing transportation initiatives
throughout the province.
|