data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec7d5/ec7d5f3b5c4b60ee6eda6a93768d7b711dfe4e46" alt="" |
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec7d5/ec7d5f3b5c4b60ee6eda6a93768d7b711dfe4e46" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec7d5/ec7d5f3b5c4b60ee6eda6a93768d7b711dfe4e46" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bd03/4bd0376a7960da16a5e1e4424f589835afc6eae7" alt="FPB Logo." |
2002/03 Annual
Service Plan Report
Forest Practices Board |
Ministry of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec7d5/ec7d5f3b5c4b60ee6eda6a93768d7b711dfe4e46" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec7d5/ec7d5f3b5c4b60ee6eda6a93768d7b711dfe4e46" alt="" |
Performance Reporting
Objectives and Strategies
1. Objective:
A redesigned Board role in the context of a results-based Code,
greater reliance on professionals and industry self-regulation.
Strategies:
- Work with government agencies in drafting legislative changes
to Board role as part of a new, results-based Code.
2. Objective:
Assessments of the efficacy of the Forest Practices Code in achieving
desired results on the ground.
Strategies:
- Pursue legislative change to clarify the Board's mandate to
evaluate and report on effectiveness of a results-based Code.
- Evaluate and report on the effectiveness of the results-based
Code in achieving specified environmental objectives.
- Monitor public concerns to identify key issues for consideration
when setting priorities for special investigations.
- Synthesize information from audits and complaint investigations
that address recurrent themes.
- Develop, field-test and implement policies and procedures that
are results- and effectiveness-oriented.
3. Objective:
Independent audits of industry and government's performance to
reinforce the application of sound forest practices throughout the
Province.
Strategies:
- Random selection and full scope implementation of:
- Area-based sets of audits involving compliance audits of
major licences, SBFEP and small tenure licences in the area,
along with an enforcement audit on the appropriateness of
government's enforcement of the Code in the area.
- Annual compliance and enforcement audits pursuant to the
Nisga'a treaty.
- Active cooperation with those developing forest practices auditing
and, specifically, with the various certification programs operating
within B.C.
4. Objective:
An efficient and respectful investigation process that responds
to public concerns about forest practices, validates sound forest
practices, and recommends improvements where needed.
Strategies:
- Carry out investigations in a logical, thorough, unbiased and
non-adversarial manner.
- Maintain regular, forthright and transparent contact with all
investigation participants.
5. Objective:
A review and appeal program that is responsive to concerns raised
by members of the public and that fosters the implementation/interpretation
of the Code that is consistent with its intent.
Strategies:
- Evaluate public requests.
- Monitor administrative decisions.
- Initiate or participate in administrative appeals when it is
in the public interest to do so.
6. Objective:
A timely reporting process that fairly and objectively represents
the general public interest.
Strategies:
- Produce analyses and reports that are concise, logical and relevant.
- Increase reliance on professional staff to conclude reports.
- Phase in shorter timelines for completion.
7. Objective:
World-class expertise in auditing and investigating forest practices.
Strategies:
- Maintain and expand expertise through regular comprehensive
training and recruitment criteria.
- Support and encourage staff contribution to national and international
forums.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/489b5/489b511f2eeca37f2bbb6c8b25a5125329b3637f" alt="Click here to return to the top of this page."
Performance Measures
Performance Measure |
2002/03 Target |
2002/03 Actual |
Variance |
A report on the redesigned role of the Board. |
1 |
0 |
-1
For release in fiscal 2004, once the regulations to the new
Forest and Range Practices Act are released.
|
Public reporting of Board views on the White
Paper for a results-based Code. |
1 |
1 |
0
June 2002
|
Published audit, investigation, and appeal
manuals that inform the public about the new way the Board conducts
its business. |
3 |
2 |
-1
Review and appeal manual not yet published. Expected in early
Fiscal 2004.
|
Number of quality-assured sets of audit
projects. |
5 area-based plus 2 compliance audits
(including Nisga'a) |
5 area-based plus 2 compliance audits (including
Nisga'a). One of the latter placed reliance on the work of certifying
auditors, resulting in a more efficient, cost-effective audit. |
N/A |
Timeliness: Percentage of audits published
within the fiscal year. |
100%s |
43% |
-57%
Three fiscal 2003 audit reports were published. Two more
reports were issued in May 2003.
|
A report on audit procedures that recognize
and complement industry forest practices audits. |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A
Report published in Fiscal 2004.
|
Timeliness: Target to report on an investigation;
80% will be completed in x months. |
8 months |
Under 6 months. |
Over 2 months faster.
For 80% of the complaint investigations undertaken.
|
Percentage of complaints where some resolution
was achieved through alternate dispute resolution. |
25% |
20% |
-5% |
Results-oriented and area-based reports
on topics of public concern. |
3 |
6 |
3 |
Percentage of decisions made by the Board
within 45 days on forest development plan reviews requested
by the public. |
100% |
100% |
N/A |
|
|