![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
Government Strategic Goals | Board Mission The Board serves the public interest as the independent watchdog for sound forest practices in British Columbia. |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Board Goals | Board Objectives | Performance Measures/Indicators | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
A strong A supportive social fabric. Safe, healthy communities and a sustainable environment. |
1.Through its program of audits and investigations, the Board will produce relevant, accurate and objective reports on forest practices in the Province of British Columbia.
|
![]() |
1. Conduct and publish independent public reports on audits of both industry and government performance, contributing to continuous improvement in forest practices.
|
![]() |
Output:
Outcome:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
2. Contribute to the development of world class forest practices auditing.
|
![]() |
Output:
Outcome:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
3. Assess the efficacy of FRPA in achieving desired results on the ground.
|
![]() |
Output:
Outcome:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
4. Conduct independent investigations and publish special reports on issues of significant public importance.
|
![]() |
Output:
Outcome:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
2.Through its program of complaint investigations and administrative appeals, the Board will provide the public with a fair and effective means to bring forward their concerns about forest practices.
|
![]() |
1. The Board will provide an easily accessible avenue for members of the public to raise concerns and have them addressed in a sensitive, timely and efficient manner.
|
![]() |
Output:
Outcome:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
2. The Board will monitor, and appeal where appropriate, administrative penalties that have a bearing on the public interest in forest practices and will also provide an opportunity for the public to influence the process of appeal of administrative decisions.
|
![]() |
Output:
Outcome:
|
The Board's independent watchdog function will promote the continuous improvement and application of sound forest practices to the sustainable management of the public forest resources of British Columbia.
Through its program of audits and investigations, the Board will produce relevant, accurate and objective public reports on forest practices in the Province of British Columbia.
Conducting and publishing independent public reports on forest practice audits and investigations.
The Board provides the public with objective information about the state of forest practices, validates sound practices and recommends improvements based upon direct field observation, consultation and research.
Conduct and publish independent public reports on audits of both industry and government performance, contributing to continuous improvement in forest practices.
The Board conducts an annual program of audits of both industry licensee and government operations. Auditees are randomly selected to remove potential bias and auditees with a positive performance record are removed from the audit population for a period of five years. The audit program consists of a combination of:
While audits in the past have been conducted primarily to assess compliance with the requirements of the Code, the Board is actively developing its capacity to conduct thematic audits, which assess the effectiveness of forest practices in achieving objectives set by government for the resources values specified in FRPA. Ongoing analysis of audit results and exit interviews with licensees will help the Board assess its contribution to continuous improvement of forest practices in British Columbia.
Performance Measures | 2004/05 Actual/Base | 2005/06 Target | 2006/07 Target | 2007/08 Target |
---|---|---|---|---|
Output | ||||
Average number of quality-assured audit projects completed and published. | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
Bulletin on annual summary of audit trends published. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Outcome | ||||
Number of audits with findings that are in compliance with FRPA requirements or that find practices that are demonstrably achieving objectives set by government as measured by scientific criteria and indicators. | Positive results trend. | Continuing positive trend. | Continuing positive trend. | Continuing positive trend. |
Contribute to the development of world class forest practices auditing.
The Board is cooperating with parties that are advancing the field of forest practices auditing. Initiatives include working with industry to augment the Board's public assurance auditing with the results of the private sector forest certification auditing being widely adopted in the province in recent years. This is intended to increase public assurance about the validity of forest practices while reducing the potential for duplication of effort.
The Board is working specifically with First Nations and resource agencies in the development of methodology, expertise, and capacity building in conducting audits intended to provide public and market assurance. Board personnel are publishing audit and investigation manuals and participating in relevant workshops and conferences.
Performance Measures | 2004/05 Actual/Base | 2005/06 Target | 2006/07 Target | 2007/08 Target |
---|---|---|---|---|
Output | ||||
Audits explicitly incorporate information arising from private sector certification and sustainable forest management planning. | Active discussions with audited licensees. | Experimental audits with forest stewardship plan adopters. | Systematic inclusion in at least half of the audits. | Systematic inclusion in all audits. |
First Nations engaged in audit program development.
|
|
Continuing engagement with interested First Nations.
|
Continuing engagement with interested First Nations.
|
Continuing engagement with interested First Nations.
|
Agencies supported in development of audit approaches and programs.
|
|
Continuing active collaboration with sister agencies.
|
Continuing active collaboration with sister agencies.
|
Continuing active collaboration with sister agencies.
|
Outcome | ||||
High quality forest practice audit systems are developing in the province which expand the degree and compatibility of public and private market assurance mechanisms. | Discussions among the audit partners are proceeding positively. | Experimental collaboration trials are being conducted and published. | Intensive collaboration among public, First Nations and private sector auditors is taking place. | Intensive collaboration among public, First Nations and private sector auditors is taking place. |
Assess the efficacy of FRPA in achieving desired results on the ground.
The Board is working with government, industry and post-secondary institutions to develop and field-test scientific audit criteria and indicators, which will provide an objective means of assessing the effectiveness of forest practices. This supports the intent of the Forest and Range Practices Act to place greater reliance on forest licensees and their professionals for achieving results rather than confining their efforts to achieving compliance with prescriptive rules. The Board will also be monitoring public concerns related to Forest Stewardship Plans (FSPs) as they become available. The key issue will be to evaluate whether FSPs are sufficiently detailed to be measurable, and once measured, to determine whether they are an effective means for licensees to achieve the objectives set by government under FRPA.
Performance Measures | 2004/05 Actual/Base | 2005/06 Target | 2006/07 Target | 2007/08 Target |
---|---|---|---|---|
Output | ||||
Number and range of audits conducted and published using prototype criteria and indicators. | Audits published using first generation criteria and indicators for soils, riparian, visuals and stand level biodiversity. | Continuing pilot use of first generation criteria and indicators sets developed by MOF. | Audits systematically employ criteria and indicators for most of the FRPA values. | Audits systematically employ criteria and indicators for the complete range of FRPA values. |
Published assessment reports on FRPA implementation, particularly the efficacy and measurability of first generation FSPs.
|
|
First Assessment Report.
|
Annual Assessment Report with initial audit results.
|
Annual Assessment Report with cumulative audit results.
|
Outcome | ||||
Scientifically derived criteria and indicators are being widely used by industry, agencies, the Board, ENGOs and First Nations to assess the effectiveness of forest practices in achieving the objectives set by government for FRPA and certification specified values. | Thematic categories of criteria and indicators are agreed to and systematic development and field application is taking place. | Practical convergence of criteria and indicators sets is occurring so that effectiveness auditing is becoming placed on a generally agreed upon scientific assessment footing. | A standard set of criteria and indicators and their field measurement methodologies are in place and in active use for assessing performance against FRPA values. | Continuing scientific and field based improvements in the criteria and indicators sets are leading to increased acceptance and application in both public and private sectors. |
Forest Stewardship Plans are providing explicitly measurable results and delivery strategies that are effectively assessed by criteria- and indicators-based audits. | Some of the initial FSPs go beyond default requirements to include results statements that are sufficiently explicit to enable criteria- and indicators-based audits. | FSPs from major licensees are being developed to reflect a combination of criteria and indicators arising from certification and FRPA based public sources. | FSPs are maturing to characterize results in a manner that makes them more precisely auditable by scientifically derived criteria and indicators. | FSP standards have developed to parallel criteria- and indicators-based audit protocols and can therefore be reliably assessed for effectiveness of practices in meeting FRPA values. |
Conduct independent investigations and publish special reports on issues of significant public importance.
The Board will annually identify issues of major public importance and of high significance for public confidence in the management of B.C.'s public forests. These issues may arise from prevailing environmental conditions such as major forest fires or insect infestations, from public concerns such as conserving endangered species or protecting community watersheds, or from technical issues such as the management of roads and bridges or riparian areas. The Board systematically tracks government and industry responses to published recommendations.
Performance Measures | 2004/05 Actual/Base | 2005/06 Target | 2006/07 Target | 2007/08 Target |
---|---|---|---|---|
Output | ||||
Number of special investigations completed and published that deal with issues of major public importance. | Current Board focus has been on Mountain Pine Beetle management, endangered species, fire rehabilitation, terrain stability, and non-timber forest products. | At least 3 major topical reports: Projected topics include forest practices in domestic watersheds, fuel management, road de-activation and access management, reforestation success. | 3 major special reports on topics of high public importance. | 3 major special reports on topics of high public importance. |
Outcome | ||||
Forest practices improvement is occurring to address the issues raised and recommendations made by the Board in its special reports. | Government and industry responses to Board recommendations are positive and forthcoming according to the Board tracking procedure as reported in our Annual Report. | Government and industry responses to Board recommendations are positive and forthcoming according to the Board tracking procedure as reported in our Annual Report. | Government and industry responses to Board recommendations are positive and forthcoming according to the Board tracking procedure as reported in our Annual Report. | Government and industry responses to Board recommendations are positive and forthcoming according to the Board tracking procedure as reported in our Annual Report. |
Through its program of complaint investigations and administrative appeals, the Board will provide the public with a fair and effective means to bring forward their concerns about forest practices.
Conducting complaint investigations and administrative appeals.
The Board provides a venue to address public complaints and concerns regarding forest practices.
The Board will provide an easily accessible avenue for members of the public to raise concerns and have them addressed in a sensitive, timely and efficient manner.
The Board responds to public complaints by assessing the scope and substance of the complaint, assessing its relevance to the Board's mandate and assigning an investigator to work with all affected participants. The Board deals with all participants in a transparent and non-adversarial manner and is committed to considering all complaints carefully and reporting complaint findings to the public. This work is done with the goal of seeking resolution to the issues by the participants themselves, where feasible. The Board makes every effort to deal with complaints promptly and efficiently, but must also proceed carefully in dealing with complex issues and be sensitive to the operational priorities and time constraints of the participants.
Performance Measures | 2004/05 Actual/Base | 2005/06 Target | 2006/07 Target | 2007/08 Target |
---|---|---|---|---|
Output | ||||
The Board processes public complaints promptly with a normal completion schedule of 7-10 months. | 80 per cent will be completed within seven months. | 80 per cent will be completed within seven months — recognizing that there are some complaints that require longer research periods or demand more extended dispute resolution efforts. | 80 per cent will be completed within seven months — recognizing that there are some complaints that require longer research periods or demand more extended dispute resolution efforts. | 80 per cent will be completed within seven months — recognizing that there are some complaints that require longer research periods or demand more extended dispute resolution efforts. |
Outcome | ||||
Participants to a complaint are satisfied that the matter was handled objectively and fairly by the Board regardless of the Board's findings and conclusions with respect to the complaint itself. | Representations and participant surveys have been conducted and residual issues dealt with to the reasonable satisfaction of the participants. | Representations and participant surveys have been conducted and residual issues dealt with to the reasonable satisfaction of the participants. | Representations and participant surveys have been conducted and residual issues dealt with to the reasonable satisfaction of the participants. | Representations and participant surveys have been conducted and residual issues dealt with to the reasonable satisfaction of the participants. |
The Board will monitor, and appeal where appropriate, administrative penalties that have a bearing on the public interest in forest practices and will also provide an opportunity for the public to influence the process of appeal of administrative decisions.
The Board monitors the flow of administrative penalties related to forest practices and may initiate or participate in administrative appeals when it believes it is in the public interest to do so. Notably, this would include administrative penalties or appeals that address fundamental forest practice issues which have been raised in Board work or interpretation of important provisions of legislation. The Board also maintains an interest in appeals which contribute to the growing body of practice surrounding the introduction of the results-based FRPA.
Performance Measures | 2004/05 Actual/Base | 2005/06 Target | 2006/07 Target | 2007/08 Target |
---|---|---|---|---|
Output | ||||
Number of determinations monitored and further selected for Board attention. | Over 200 administrative determinations examined for potential intervention by the Board. | Variable depending on circumstances but in the 200 range. | Variable depending on circumstances but in the 200 range. | Variable depending on circumstances but in the 200 range. |
Number of administrative appeals enjoined by the Board.
|
|
Variable depending on circumstances but in the 6-10 range.
|
Variable depending on circumstances but in the 6-10 range.
|
Variable depending on circumstances but in the 6-10 range.
|
Outcome | ||||
Board response to administrative penalties and appeals is contributing to the effective definition and implementation of forest practices regulation in the province. | The substance of Board positions taken in appeals before the Forest Appeal Commission is acknowledged and incorporated in the eventual decisions. | The substance of Board positions taken in appeals before the Forest Appeal Commission is acknowledged and incorporated in the eventual decisions. | The substance of Board positions taken in appeals before the Forest Appeal Commission is acknowledged and incorporated in the eventual decisions. | The substance of Board positions taken in appeals before the Forest Appeal Commission is acknowledged and incorporated in the eventual decisions. |
Public access is enhanced by allowing complainants an opportunity to be heard in the formal appeal process. | Persons engaging in the appeal process have found the Board interventions useful according to participant surveys. | Persons engaging in the appeal process have found the Board interventions useful according to participant surveys. | Persons engaging in the appeal process have found the Board interventions useful according to participant surveys. | Persons engaging in the appeal process have found the Board interventions useful according to participant surveys. |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |